Candidate Standard

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

This standard defines the choreography for reporting Over-Claim Discrepancies depicted below.

Editorial Comment
Updated diagram.
 


 

Items in Claim Detail Message(s) received that are not subject to any discrepancy may be progressed in accordance with relevant licence agreements.


An Over-Claim Discrepancy Notification created in accordance with this Profile comprises:

  1. One Header Record CDMH;
  2. 1-n Summary Record CDS1;
  3. One or more Over-Claim Discrepancy Records CDD2
    1. each CDD2 must be followed by 2-n CDD3 Records that provide details regarding the rights claims provided to the Licensor from, potentially, all Licensors that contribute to the over-claim;
  4. One Footer Record  CDMF SRFO.

Details about these Record Types are provided in Part 2 of this Standard.

If a Licensee receives Claim Detail Messages from one Licensor that, on its own, contains an over-claim, the Licensee should use the Profile for Reporting Line Item Discrepancies as defined in Part 4 of this Standard as there is a high likelihood of an underlying data issue (rather than an over-claim). 

To indicate that a Claim Detail Discrepancy Notification is created in accordance with Profile, the Profile Cell in the Header Record shall be set to OverClaimDiscrepancy and the ProfileVersion Cell to 1.0.

  • No labels